Wednesday, June 16, 2010
"when it comes to social and economic rights asserted by disadvantaged and marginalised people – potentially popular causes until the possible tax implications are explained – the dominant figures on recent Supreme Courts seem firmly committed to the idea of a strict construction of the Constitution deferring to the Executive (or Parliament) in what are deemed to be policy questions. This position is presented – often immodestly and with no concession to irony – as one of judicial restraint."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment